|
Differences between ribosome coverage and ribosome profiles
|
|
07-May-2016, 04:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-May-2016 04:57 PM by First citizen of GWIPS.)
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Differences between ribosome coverage and ribosome profiles
It does not really matter since 'a-site'='p-site'+3
IMO showing locations of a-sites is more natural because these are the codons that are being decoded by the ribosomes that leave footprints. However, the most popular method for determining offset is looking at the distance between the high peak at the 5' end of the metagene profile relative to the location of the start codon. This distance is assumed to be the distance between the P-site codon and 5' end of the footprint, because the initiator tRNA is incorporated into the p-site, not the a-site. So for some people it might be more natural to show p-site locations for all the ribosomes. I don't think it really matters as long as you don't mix the two. (04-May-2016 08:19 PM)chrishlee23 Wrote: Audrey and Eva, primus inter pares
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Differences between ribosome coverage and ribosome profiles - audrey - 14-Aug-2013, 10:05 AM
RE: Differences between ribosome coverage and ribosome profiles - audrey - 14-Aug-2013, 10:08 AM
RE: Differences between ribosome coverage and ribosome profiles - chrishlee23 - 04-May-2016, 08:19 PM
RE: Differences between ribosome coverage and ribosome profiles - First citizen of GWIPS - 07-May-2016 04:56 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

GWIPS-viz
Forum
Search
Member List
Help


